Behold these two straightforward English sentences describing a system status:
“Maintenance – started at 9:30…”
“A problem – started at 9:30…”
Nothing seemingly “wrong” there… And yet there is a hidden issue which became apparent once the Danish translation surfaced.
You see the two English “started”-words are not 100% the same and the difference is best seen when switching to past tense: while we can say both “Maintenance – WAS started at 9:00” and “Maintenance – HAS started at 9:00”, the same symmetry does not apply to “an Error”: we can NOT say in English “Error – WAS Started at 9:00”, we can only say “Error – HAS started at 9:00”. This has to do with the strange nature of an error, we can not say about it that it actively “was started” (here “started” is practically an adverb, describing “was”). An error will typically occur by itself and we can just note a time when it has started (this “started” is a verb, past tense).
In Danish the difference between the two meanings is more visible, as the various cases actually get different word-endings:
English ==> Danish:
was started ==> blev startet, startedes
has started ==> har startet
started (verb) ==> startede
started (adverb) ==> startet
So, in Danish we can not use the (original) translation-pair:
“Vedligeholdelse – startet kl. 9.00…”
“En fejl – startet kl. 9.00…”
The correct translation is:
“Vedligeholdelse – startede kl. 9.00…”
“En fejl – startede kl. 9.00…”
The English statement “The box was empty” was translated into Danish as “Kassen var tom”. While “Kasse” indeed means “a Box” in Danish, unfortunately the same word is also the word for a “Cash Register”. The Danish word for “Packaging” (Danish: “Emballage”) would be a more fortunate choice.
English ==> Danish
The box was empty ==> Kassen var tom
The cash register was empty ==> Kassen var tom (<== yes, it’s the same as above! 🙂 )
The packaging was empty ==> Emballagen var tom
Marriage-Poison-300x253.jpg 300w, http://rottendanish.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Marriage-Poison-354x300.jpg 354w" sizes="(max-width: 478px) 100vw, 478px" />
Some times it seems so obvious and yet it isn’t . If A = A and B = B then AB should equal AB,-and maybe even AB = BA, and yet languages don’t work like that…
Sequence of words matters. And, to make matters more interesting, the way the sequence matters is different between languages.
For instance, in English a “Work of Art’ is not the same as “Artwork”. A “Work of Art’ is something bigger, while “Artwork” illustrates books and ornaments wall.
The respective words in Danish are “Kunst” (English: Art) and “Værk” (English: (Piece of) Work). So, yes, you guessed it right: “Artwork” does NOT translate into “Kunstværk” in Danish. “Kunstværk” is the proper translation of “Work of Art”, while “Artwork” in Danish is more properly translated as “Illustration”, and also the English Artwork is being used often “untranslated”.
English ==> Danish :
Artwork ==> Illustration, Artwork
Work of art ==> Kunstværk
Sequence matters. So does a space.
In Danish a Husband is “Ægtemand”, which must not be confused with “Ægte mand”…
Danish ==> English:
En ægtemand ==> Husband
En ægte mand ==> a real man
And while we’re on the topic of Marriage, in Danish the word for Poison and for “Being Married” are the same. I have no clever explanation, but I am sure you can easily make a few of your own… 🙂
Danish ==> English:
Gift (adjective) ==> Married
Gift (noun) ==> Poison
Gave (noun) ==> Gift